No I haven’t disappeared into irreverence. Just got a little busy on the art side. Meanwhile life still goes on.. MRT is living up to the new name I gave it – MST (See Issue 10/12), Hougang is seeing election fever again bullying what-nots and all afoot, across the causeway Anwar is getting charged.. again, while on the international front Facebook IPO-ed into a stock market rollocking from the never-ending greek tragedy and promptly got tangled into its own greed mess. Wow, a lot sure happens in a little over a month. But my focus is irreverence. And my biggest laugh lately has gotta be:
HEADLINE 1: CENTRE TO TRAIN FUTURE HAWKERS
I’d say the ruling goverment is too “eng” (free) in between conducting confusing train breakdown enquiries that seem to be getting nowhere and taking pot shots at the hammer party. In typical garment (government) style, they think throwing money can re-create anything. If it is great in the first place and sprung from the local grounds, nurture it. But nope, they must attempt to re-”build a pipe line of skilled hawkers in anticipation of the 10 new hawker centres to be built within the next decade”. Call a tender to capture the knowledge of hawkers to re-invent good street food? Bwahaha.. Even Coca-Cola doesn’t divulge its formula. I hope WDA has a multi-million budget to accomplish its mission impossible to persuade “Hawkers not keen to share recipes” in the next headline. Or they can try Kay Lee whose secret recipe is up for grabs, $2M only (see Issue 8/12).
HEADLINE 2: PLAN FOR CENTRAL AGENCY TO MANAGE CLEANING JOBS
You can’t fault the ruling party for being unthorough. Once they decide to meddle with the hawker scene, they must interfere all the way to the loo. Don’t get me wrong. I am all for improving public toilets, a bane in Singapore, not just in hawker centres. But is a high level government agency needed to decide how much to charge for 2 pieces of toilet paper to enter a centrally managed loo? Surely the root of the problem isn’t just about economies of scale. Improve the lot of cleaners to begin with. Stop all the garment outsourcing to the cheapest agency that squeezes the workers in a never-ending cycle of poor pay and unrespected work conditions. And what about public education? Good eating, and clearing, habits can be encouraged. Have self-help disposal amenities available instead of always relying on the over-burdened cleaner. But no, the be-all solution is to set up another bureaucratic agency, and yah, call another tender.
HEADLINE 3: AH-TAI STILL WINS
Yes, still on hawkers.. a national obsession these days. This one is solely created by the press for want of nothing to report. Sniff a rivalry and report the split in dramatic fashion, thereby creating a scramble for the “underdog” stall. And then report some more and do a food comparison critique. We’ve seen it all before. Katong laksa comes to mind. Now it’s Maxwell chicken rice. I know, I know. The garment can create a new dispute resolution agency for hawkers. After all, it already has grandiose plans to create its own recipe of great hawkers operating in sterilized hawker centres, surely a third can be created to coordinate all efforts into building an everlasting harmonious legacy of our great hawker culture, no doubt an attraction to bring in more tourists/foreign talent to Singapore? Although I still don’t see any of the original Katong Laksa proclaimers, Tian Tian Chicken Rice or even Ah-Tai, being persuaded to reveal their secret recipes, not for a lark anyway, as the garment seems to think.
HEADLINE 4: WHY SINGAPOREANS ARE THE HAPPIEST IN THE REGION
This one is really funny. Of course the local papers must trumpet about Singapore being No. 1, never mind that we are actually #33 on the list after.. err Turkmenistan. But we beat Malaysia so there. To think that the UN is also so free to do a “World Happiness Study” I kid you not. I wonder who they asked? Not me. I will believe if they rank Singaporeans the #1 Complainers in the Region AND the World, haha..
HEADLINE 5: DOGS CAN ‘CATCH’ YAWNS, STUDY FINDS
In the veritable world of “bo-liao” (nothing better to do) studies, and we have a few today, there is one that reads: A dog’s yawn, get this, is a cross-species ability to empathise with humans. Wow, I am amazed. Man’s best friend can indeed empathise with us. I can remember Lucky, the family dachshund from my childhood days, lying lazily at the doorway on a hot afternoon, drooping eyes, ears and all, stifling a sleepy yawn when I was trying to direct it to chase the birds behind him. I lost. And yawned. So I must have a cross-species ability to empathise with canines? Or dogs can not only empathise but influence humans?? Bah.. Talk about reading too much into sleepiness.. yawn. Time to catch 40 winks and I’d go to bed might happily today in order to live up to the tag of the happiest people in the region

